There are many different types of CMS architectures: traditional, decoupled, headless, and hybrid. Each has its own benefits and drawbacks.
Traditional CMS architectures are the most common. They are based on a model where the CMS sits in the middle of the web application and the user interface and back-end logic are tightly coupled. This approach has several drawbacks, including inflexibility and a lack of separation of concerns.
Decoupled CMS architectures are based on a model where the CMS sits outside of the web application and the user interface and back-end logic are decoupled. This approach has several benefits, including flexibility and separation of concerns. However, it can be more complex to set up and maintain.
Headless CMS architectures are based on a model where the CMS sits outside of the web application and the user interface is decoupled, but the back-end logic is tightly coupled. This approach has several benefits, including flexibility and separation of concerns. However, it can be more complex to set up and maintain.
Hybrid CMS architectures are based on a model where the CMS sits in the middle of the web application and the user interface and back-end logic are loosely coupled. This approach has several benefits, including flexibility and a lack of separation of concerns. However, it can be more complex to set up and maintain.
